Practical Exploration on the Assessment and Evaluation Mechanism of Party Construction in Grass-roots Organs
Source: Flag Micro Platform
Practical Exploration on the Assessment and Evaluation Mechanism of Party Construction in Grass-roots Organs
—— Take the "1+N" assessment mechanism of the fortress index of the Party branch of Beijing No.2 Intermediate People’s Court as an example.
The General Secretary of the Supreme Leader stressed that "it is necessary to improve and perfect the assessment and evaluation mechanism of party building in government organs, and give play to the role of assessment baton and selection and appointment guidance". Beijing No.2 Intermediate People’s Court has 31 party branches. In recent years, the Party Committee of Beijing No.2 Intermediate People’s Court has vigorously promoted the "1+N" assessment mechanism of the Party branch fortress index, which has further promoted the comprehensive and strict administration of the Party and the party building work of the government. It is an exploratory and beneficial attempt to play the role of the grass-roots Party branch in the government and the vanguard and exemplary role of the police officers in party member.
Construction of "1+N" Assessment Index System
The "1+N" evaluation index system of the Party branch fortress index of the Second Intermediate People’s Court adopts the principle of combining point with surface, focusing on quantification and dynamic management. It not only pays attention to the key work of the central and higher authorities, but also fully considers the actual situation of each party branch, so as to make the content clear, prioritize and highlight the key points, and ensure the accuracy of the examination to the greatest extent. Pay attention to increasing the weight of the assessment of the implementation of key tasks, guide the implementation of party branches, and identify the focus and foothold of party building work.
Clear the scope of assessment.The Second Intermediate People’s Court adhered to the problem orientation and built the "1+N" evaluation index system of the Party branch fortress index closely around the question of "what to test". Adhere to the party’s political construction as the main line, and set six types of indicators according to the standards of "five modernizations and one good" (ideological education, standardization of organizational life, branding of party building in branches, refinement of service center, systematization of work system, and full play of fortress role): political construction indicators, ideological construction indicators, organizational construction indicators, discipline style indicators, service indicators for the masses, and cultural construction indicators, and strive to build a strong political function and a strong branch team. The assessment covers studying and propagating the Supreme Leader’s Socialism with Chinese characteristics Thought in the new era, implementing the decisions of the central and higher-level organizations, managing cadres and talents by the Party, improving the integrity discipline and anti-corruption struggle, improving the ability of mass work and grassroots governance, integrating the work of the trial execution center with economic and social development, and the spiritual civilization and morality of the unit. Draw a "road map" and "construction drawing" to guide the party branches to accurately guide and concentrate their efforts.
Set indicators scientifically.Assessment indicators reflect quantitative assessment, which decomposes the relevant assessment requirements into several assessment points and gives certain scores according to their importance. Indicators can be divided into basic categories, innovation demonstration categories, negative veto categories and other different types. There are 23 basic indicators in the assessment system, with a full score of 100, 7 positive plus indicators, with a cumulative score of no more than 30 points and 3 negative minus indicators, with a cumulative score of no more than 20 points.
Set the weights accurately.According to the importance and workload of the work, each index is given different weights and scores. Always put the party’s political construction in the first place, and assign the highest proportion to political leadership in the score setting; Emphasize the implementation of the main responsibility of party building, and promote the implementation of the list of responsibilities of party branches, party branch secretaries, party branch members, party groups and party group leaders to form a joint force; Emphasize that the party branch should concentrate on major tests, important contradictions, urgent and dangerous tasks and play the role of a fighting fortress; It is emphasized that we should consciously act under the overall situation, take the initiative to contribute to the big exam, grasp the party building and lead the team to promote the trial, make contributions based on the main business, comprehensively improve the standardization and refinement level of the whole process of trial execution, and provide high-quality and efficient judicial services for the capital to take the lead in basically realizing Chinese modernization.
Implementation of "1+N" Assessment
Under the unified leadership of the Party Committee of the Second Intermediate People’s Court, the Party Committee of the government is responsible for organizing the implementation of the "1+N" assessment of the fortress index of the Party branch. The "fortress index" of the Party branch is evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively according to the procedures of self-evaluation of the Party branch, evaluation of the Party Committee of the government, evaluation of the Party group of the hospital and publicity of bright points. Conduct an assessment every quarter, and conduct another assessment of the party building work in the previous year in January of the following year. According to the evaluation score, the party branch is divided into four grades: excellent, good, average and unqualified. For the party branches rated as excellent grades, help sum up experience, build characteristic brands, and strive to build them into demonstration sites for grass-roots party building, giving priority to the selection of advanced party organizations and outstanding party workers in the organs; Strengthen the education and guidance for the Party branch rated as general grade, help to clear up the thinking, make clear the goal of catching up and catching up, and promote the promotion; For the party branch assessed as unqualified, the party secretary of the organ and the leaders in charge will interview the party branch secretary in time, contact the members to help and guide, identify the problems and crux, clarify the rectification objectives, formulate the rectification and upgrading plan, and rectify and improve within a time limit. If it is assessed as a general or unqualified party branch, the evaluation results will be included in the performance evaluation of the party branch secretary.
The achievements of party building assessment
The political background is further polished.The political stance of police officers in party member has been further improved, and the political stance of supporting the "Two Establishments" has been strengthened. The political determination of police officers in party member has been further consolidated, and their political judgment, political understanding and political execution have been continuously improved.The responsibility of party building has been further consolidated.The secretary of the Party branch has paid more attention to the party building work, and he has taken the initiative to think about and deploy the party building work. The branch team has formed a good working force, and the organization, combat effectiveness and cohesion of the branch have been continuously improved.Grass-roots organizations have been further improved.Each party branch is more planned for the overall working ideas and key tasks of the branch, and the organizational life system such as the branch Committee system and the "three meetings and one lesson" system has been further implemented, and the standardization of grassroots party organizations has made great progress.The backward party branch has been further rectified.Some backward party branches, with the guidance and help of the party group of the college and the party Committee of the government, adhere to the problem orientation and pay close attention to the implementation of rectification. All basic systems have been well implemented and the quality and efficiency of all work have been significantly improved.
Deficiencies in the assessment of party building
During the implementation of the "1+N" assessment of the fortress index of the Party branch, some problems have also been found: for example, the classification assessment is ambiguous; at present, there are many common indicators and few personality indicators in the assessment, and there are many general jobs and few special jobs, with emphasis on the assessment of common jobs and tasks. The setting of evaluation indicators is too detailed, and the number of indicators is generally too large, trying to cover all aspects, which leads to the small weight of some key tasks, which affects the work orientation to some extent. The evaluation criteria are prone to errors, and many tasks can only be quantified by "yes" or "no", "yes" or "no", "done" or "not done", without distinguishing the degree of completion and the quality of work. The personnel strength is insufficient, the evaluation content is meticulous, the system is huge, the evaluation procedure is cumbersome, the party cadres are few, and the evaluation task is under great pressure.
Optimization path of party building assessment and evaluation
The evaluation subject is diversified.The effectiveness of grass-roots party building depends not only on the evaluation of higher-level party committees, but also on the satisfaction of the masses in party member. Therefore, it is necessary to promote the multi-dimensional extension of the evaluation subject, pay attention to the participation, benefit and satisfaction of the people in party member, and give full play to the main role of the people in party member. For example, we can introduce public opinion surveys, mass evaluation, online questionnaires and other forms, and introduce evaluation methods such as self-evaluation by the masses in party member Branch and mutual evaluation by Party branches, so as to maximize the democratic, scientific, transparent and diversified evaluation. At the same time, we should pay attention to the weight ratio of evaluation results among different evaluation subjects, give reasonable weights according to the principles of importance and scientificity, and strive to truly and comprehensively reflect the achievements and problems of grassroots party building work, and form an integrated evaluation system of "vertical promotion, horizontal interaction, overall linkage and comprehensive coverage".
Fine classification assessment.The evaluation indicators should not be generalized, but should be based on the focus of the trial execution department on closing the case and improving the quality and efficiency of the trial, as well as the performance of the comprehensive functional departments in completing the key tasks of the hospital, highlighting the characteristics and characteristics of different party organizations, paying attention to practical results, classified management, classified guidance and classified assessment, and listing different evaluation indicators, so as to guide different types of party branches to find the focus and foothold of grassroots party building work.
Flexibility of evaluation indicators.We should pay attention to the unity of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of grass-roots party building, and we should not ignore the clear and specific standards and basis, nor the qualitative evaluation of relatively abstract tasks and objectives, such as the evaluation of superior party committees, the evaluation of party member people, the results of key work, and the rectification of problems, especially the evaluation of key contents such as party branch team building, party member team education management, and party building leading center work. It is not limited to paper-based assessment, but through questionnaires, on-the-spot investigation, contest examination and other forms, so that the assessment results truly conform to the actual results of the work and extensive evaluation.
Update and optimize the evaluation focus.While attaching importance to the evaluation of basic and prescribed actions, we should further strengthen the evaluation of innovative, self-selected and key work, such as reducing the scores of basic indicators such as organizational life, party membership fee collection and management, and increasing the proportion of evaluation indicators such as party building leading the development of central work, doing practical things for the masses, completing key tasks assigned by superiors, and concentrating on the entrepreneurial spirit of branch party member, or taking the usual assessment of comprehensive, long-term and prescribed actions. At the same time, it is necessary to optimize the current mode of uniformly assigning additional points at the end of the year, and divide the additional points into quarterly assessments to enhance the encouragement of innovative actions.